MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288796922 · doi:10.1002/spp2.1038

A review of the evolution, biostratigraphy, provincialism and diversity of<scp>M</scp>iddle and early<scp>L</scp>ate<scp>T</scp>riassic conodonts

2015· review· en· W2288796922 on OpenAlexaff
Yanlong Chen, Leopold Krystyn, Michael J. Orchard, Xulong Lai, Sylvain Richoz

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers in Palaeontology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
FundersScience and Engineering Research Board
KeywordsSubfamilyConodontGenusBiologyZoologyTaxonomy (biology)Evolutionary biologyBiostratigraphyPaleontologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The taxonomy, diversity, evolutionary lineages, and stratigraphical distributions of M iddle and early L ate T riassic conodonts are reviewed and re‐evaluated. Twenty‐five genera are recognized in the M iddle and early L ate T riassic, including a new genus cited in open nomenclature. Of these, 24 genera are assigned to two families and seven subfamilies. The family G ondolellidae consists of the subfamilies C ornudininae, E pigondolellinae, N eogondolellinae, N ovispathodinae, P aragondolellinae and P seudofurnishiinae. The family G ladigondolellidae is monotypic, consisting of the subfamily G ladigondolellinae. The genus N eostrachanognathus is not assigned to any family or subfamily as its origin is unclear. Conodont provincialism was low in the early A nisian, but from the late A nisian faunistic differences started to increase and became stronger during the early L adinian, reaching a peak around the mid‐ L adinian. Provincialism remained strong until the earliest C arnian and changed to an all‐ T riassic low in the early T uvalian. The provincialism between N orth A merica and T ethys rebounded on the specific level during the late T uvalian. Diversities on generic and specific levels have been established, and two major conodont diversity cycles are recognized: the first ranges from the B ithynian (early A nisian) to the J ulian (late early C arnian), and the second is restricted to the T uvalian (late C arnian).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapers in PalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207