The protective effect of trimetazidine against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nephrotoxicity is a dose-limiting side effect of cisplatin (CSP). The study investigated the possible protective role of trimetazidine (TMZ) against CSP-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Rats were divided into four groups; control, TMZ, CSP, and CSP + TMZ. The CSP group showed significant deterioration in kidney function with structural changes in the form of interstitial hemorrhage, glomeruli shrinkage and peritublar capillary congestion, tubular cells vacuolation, pyknosis, shedding and necrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltrates, all indicating renal damage. CSP also caused a significant increase in the lipid peroxidation marker malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, renal nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) DNA-binding activity and protein expression, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and IL-6 levels. Treatment with TMZ before and after CSP injection produced significant improvement of kidney function and histopathology. TMZ treatment also significantly attenuated CSP-induced oxidative stress and suppressed elevated levels of TNF-α and IL-6 and NF-κB expression and its DNA-binding activity caused by CSP administration. TMZ has a protective effect against CSP-induced nephrotoxicity mediated by reduction of oxidative stress and attenuation of CSP-induced inflammation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".