MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289025053 · doi:10.1161/hyp.62.suppl_1.a302

Abstract 302: Aerobic Exercise Effects on Endothelial Health Status in Pre- and Post Menopausal African American Women

2013· article· en· W2289025053 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Grimm, Jan Kretzschmar, Sunny R. Thakkar, Chenyi Ling, Keith M. Diaz, Kathleen M. Sturgeon, Deborah L. Feairheller, Amanda Perkins, Hojun Lee, Sheara T. Williamson, Dianne Babitt, Michael D. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsSturgeon Community Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndothelial dysfunctionMenopauseCD31Internal medicineAerobic exerciseHormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)EndotheliumEndocrinologyCardiologyGynecologyTestosterone (patch)Angiogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: When compared to other racial groups, African American women (AAW) reach menopause at an earlier age and are at an increase risk for CVD and endothelial health complications. A known intervention for the treatment of both CVD and menopausal changes is aerobic exercise training (AEXT). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of AEXT on endothelial function between pre- and post- menopausal AAW. Methods: Sedentary, non-smoking pre- and post- menopausal AAW not on hormone replacement therapy and free of CVD completed AEXT. Participants exercised at 65% of their VO2max for 40 min, 3 days/wk, for 6 months. Participants completed flow-mediated dilation (FMD) testing and blood sample collection. Endothelial microparticles from plasma samples were analyzed by labeling with late stage apoptotic antibodies CD31+/CD42b- and early phase endothelial dysfunction and endothelial activation CD62E+ and quantified using flow cytometry. Results: No difference in FMD was found between groups before (7.11±1.2 vs. 7.73±0.8 %) or after (10.38±0.2 vs. 9.88±0.6 %) AEXT. Both pre- (7.11±1.2 vs. 10.38±0.2 %, p≤0.005) and post- (7.73±0.8 vs. 9.88±0.6 %, p≤0.043) menopausal women significantly increased FMD after AEXT. CD31+/CD42b- EMPs did not differ between pre- and post-menopausal AAW before (4.52±0.9 vs. 2.9±0.4 events/μL) or after (2.1±0.4 vs. 2.31±0.5e vents/μL) AEXT. CD31+/CD42b- levels significantly decreased in pre-menopausal AAW (4.52±0.9 vs. 2.1±0.4 events/μL, p≤0.015) after AEXT. CD62E+ EMPS were not different between pre- and post-menopausal groups before (44±8.5 vs. 42.5±9 events/μL) or after (26.64±8.4 vs. 19.79±3.2 events/μL) AEXT. Both pre- (44±8.5 vs. 26.6±8.4 events/μL, p≤0.034) and post-menopausal (42.5±9 vs. 19.8±3.2 events/μL, p≤0.008) groups had lower levels of CD62E+ EMPs after AEXT. Discussion: No difference was found in terms of vascular function or health between pre- and post-menopausal AAW. Both groups showed improvements in vascular function and health after AEXT. Our findings suggest AEXT has significant improvements in terms of endothelial function and vascular health in AAW regardless of being a pre- or post-menopausal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207