MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289573039 · doi:10.1155/2012/984260

Eosinophilic Esophagitis – Recognition, Diet and Drugs

2012· editorial· en· W2289573039 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marietta Iacucci, Subrata Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEosinophilic esophagitisMedicineGastroenterologyDermatologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E osinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disorder trig- gered by food or other environmental antigens.EoE presents with food impaction and dysphagia in adults.In children, the symptoms may be more diverse including failure to thrive, vomiting, gagging and gastroesophageal reflux-like symptoms.Overall, the prevalence of EoE in the general population is approximately 50 per 100,000.EoE is mediated by T helper cell 2 cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13, which promote eosinophil recruitment via eotaxin-3 (1).The diagnosis of EoE depends on the presence of esophageal dysfunction symptoms, the exclusion of gastroesophageal reflux and the presence of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power microscopy field in esophageal biopsy, with the eosinophilia limited to the esophagus.Proton pump inhibitor-responsive EoE is also a recognized subgroup.Although EoE may present with normal endoscopic findings, characteristic endoscopic features are increasingly being recognized.These include esophageal rings, strictures, narrow-calibre esophagus, linear furrows, white plaques or exudates, and pallor or decreased vasculature.These findings help to diagnose EoE by guiding biopsy decisions and to assess a patient's response to therapy (2).In a systematic review of endoscopic findings from patients with EoE, Kim et al (3) recently demonstrated a high pooled prevalence of at least one endoscopic finding in patients with EoE, although prevalence rates for individual findings varied and could be low.They concluded that individual endoscopic findings had high levels of specificity but low sensitivity, and the predictive values were inadequate for diagnostic purposes.Using high-resolution endoscopy with filter techniques or using confocal endomicroscopy may increase diagnostic yields, but endoscopist education and familiarity with the abnormalities may be crucial in not missing subtle abnormalities (Figure 1).The medical treatment of EoE is predominantly via use of topical steroids, either swallowed fluticasone or oral viscous budesonide; the latter may be more effective (4).Second-line medical therapies include systemic steroids and the leukotriene antagonist montelukast.Proton pump inhibitors may be useful because some patients are responsive.Esophageal strictures may be dilated at endoscopy followed by medical therapy (1).Such dilation may be as safe as dilating other benign strictures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0100.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of GastroenterologySame topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207