MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289802754 · doi:10.1093/phe/phv035

Republicanism and the Paradox of Public Health Preconditions Comments on Steve Latham

2015· article· en· W2289802754 on OpenAlex
Leticia Morales

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health Ethics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPublic healthSociologyLibrary sciencePublic policyMedia studiesSocial sciencePolitical scienceLawMedicineNursingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Republicanism and the Paradox of Public Health Preconditions Comments on Steve Latham Get access Leticia Morales Leticia Morales * Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University *Corresponding author: Leticia Morales, Institute for Health and Social Policy, Charles Meredith House, 1130 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada. Tel.: 514-398-5771 ; Fax: 514-398-8983 ; Email: letimorales17@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Public Health Ethics, Volume 9, Issue 2, July 2016, Pages 150–152, https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phv035 Published: 16 December 2015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.043
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0430.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.606
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it