MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effective prevention and therapy of ovarian cancer with sperm protein 17 vaccination (95.7)

2010· article· en· W2289875808 on OpenAlexaff
Maurizio Chiriva, Yuefei Yu, Leonardo Mirandola, Marjorie Jenkins, Caroline Chapman, Martin J. Cannon, Everardo Cobos, W. Martin Kast

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian cancerAntigenVaccinationImmunologyImmune systemMedicineCancerCancer vaccineEpitopeImmunotherapyCancer researchBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sperm protein (Sp17) is an attractive target for cancer vaccines because of its over-expression in primary and metastatic ovarian cancer (OC). Our studies suggest that a Sp17-based vaccine can induce an enduring defense against OC development in C57BL/6 mice with ID8 OC cells, following prophylactic and therapeutic treatments. Our results show that a SP17 protein based vaccine combined with CpG induced an effective CD8 mediated immune response against Sp17 protein. This is the first time that a mouse counterpart of a cancer testis antigen (Sp17) was shown to be expressed in an OC mouse model. and that vaccination against this antigen significantly controlled tumor growth . The CpG-adjuvanted vaccine are activating Th17 cells while inhibiting immunosuppressive T-reg cells, suggesting a reprogramming of active cellular-mediated response against Sp17-expressing tumor cells. Taken together, these results indicate that prophylactic and therapeutic vaccinations can induce long-standing protection against OC and delay tumor growth, suggesting that this strategy may provide additional treatments of human OC and the prevention of disease onset in women with a family history of OC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→