MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2289996198 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2016.7418055

20.9 A 1.92mW filtering transimpedance amplifier for RF current passive mixers

2016· article· en· W2289996198 on OpenAlex
Tian Ya Liu, Antonio Liscidini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransimpedance amplifierAmplifierCurrent (fluid)Electrical engineeringRadio frequencyComputer scienceElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsOperational amplifierPhysicsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, current passive mixers represent the state of the art for signal down-conversion in wireless receivers. In such kind of structures, noise, distortions and losses are strictly correlated to the performance of the stage following the mixer. The most common solution adopted to sense the down-converted current is a transimpedance amplifier (TIA) in shunt with a capacitance to ground that assures a low input impedance when the loop gain of the amplifier decreases (Fig. 20.9.1a). A low input impedance is necessary to have a small voltage swing at the output of the mixer (typically few hundreds mV) to minimize the modulation of the switch resistance and with it the distortion produced during the downconversion. The input capacitance can also be used to filter the majority of the out-of-band interferers by transforming the TIA into a filter [1,2] (Fig. 20.9.1b). This reduces the dynamic range required by the TIA and its power consumption. This advantage comes at a cost of area, since the limited voltage swing tolerable at the input of the TIA demands a large capacitor to absorb the downconverted interferers. This trade-off is relaxed with the proposed solution (Fig. 20.9.2), where the input capacitance (C1) is partially boosted by a feedback network minimizing the swing required at the input of the TIA. This idea, originally proposed in [3] only to improve the 1dB compression point, is now used to maximize the spurious-free dynamic range of the TIA, exploiting an intrinsic in-band highpass shaping of noise and distortion. Furthermore, an adaptive transfer function, which improves its filtering action in presence of large out-of-band interferers, is realized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207