MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Advanced age does not impair the development of functional memory CD8+ T cells following West Nile virus infection (83.4)

2009· article· en· W2290400492 on OpenAlexaff
Alina Lelic, Robin Parsons, Lisa Hayes, Jonathan L. Bramson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunosenescenceCD8ImmunologyT cellBiologyVirologyImmune systemEpitopeCytotoxic T cellImmunityVirusAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract West Nile virus (WNV) infection of aged patients typically leads to the development of severe neuroencephalitis. Studies in mice have elucidated an important role for CD8+ T cell function in controlling WNV infection and we hypothesized that the increased severity of WNV illness in the aged results from impaired CD8+ T cell function due to immunosenescence. We examined the functional profile of WNV-specific CD8+ T cell memory responses from a cohort of young and aged WNV infected patients using polychromatic flow cytometry. We quantified production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 and CD107a mobilization by WNV-specific CD8+ T cells. We did not observe any relationship between advanced age and either the breadth or the magnitude of CD8+ T cell function. The magnitude of IFN-γ and TNF-α responses to WNV epitope stimulation did not decline with advanced age. Production of IL-2 was not detected from either young or aged CD8+ T cells. The ability to degranulate in response to virus peptide was also the same in young and aged patients. Collectively these data fail to support our hypothesis and suggest that, contrary to current models of immunosenescence, aged patients do develop functional CD8+ T cell immunity following exposure to a novel virus infection. This work was funded by a contract from NIAID (N01-AI-40066).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicMosquito-borne diseases and control→French-language works237,207→