Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis focuses on the examination of the motives and tactics of the British Columbia suffragists in their campaign from 1890 to 1917 to secure political equality with men. Also investigated are the nature of the leadership and membership of the movement and the perspectives of the suffragists' allies and opponents. Additionally, the British Columbia woman suffrage movement is studied in the context of the general reform impulse in the province, Canada and other western nations during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The British Columbia woman suffrage campaign was closely linked throughout its duration to a general campaign to remedy the subordinate legal status of women in the province. Yet, while united by this common theme, the campaign can be divided into two distinct phases. Prior to 1910 efforts to secure the school board, municipal, provincial and federal franchises were conducted primarily by suffragists who subscribed to the view that women were naturally endowed to exercise a beneficent influence within the home, the local community and the nation as nurturers, preservers of virtue and purifiers. They argued that by participating in government women could activate the moral regeneration of society and thereby combat what they perceived to be the adverse effects of industrialization, urbanization, immigration and the persistence of frontier social institutions such as the saloon. By 1910, however, the social reformers were joined by a group of new suffragists who emphasized that women should be granted political equality as it was the democratic right of all citizens. Demanding a wider scope for women's activities than the majority of the first generation of suffragists, these women maintained that they should be able to utilize the vote on behalf of their various and sometimes divergent interests as homemakers, consumers, wage-earners, philanthropists and professionals. Despite these differences of perspective, all the suffragists maintained that the problem of women's subordinate status could be solved by legislative means. They believed that an equal partnership between men and women in public and private life would occur automatically following the winning of the ballot. Similarly, the suffragists principally interested in social reforms thought that they could be most effectively enacted by legislation. The suffragists also viewed state intervention in the form of legislation as necessary to preserve the liberty of the individual, either by granting him specific rights such as the ballot or by restricting the social behaviour of persons not conforming to the general norm. In this respect the British Columbia woman suffrage movement can be characterized as a liberal movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".