MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291013525

Shorter Article: Re-Conceptualizing Equality: A Place for Indigenous Political Identity

2001· article· en· W2291013525 on OpenAlexaffabout
Larry Chartrand

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPoliticsCharterPolitical scienceSocial equalityEquity (law)Government (linguistics)Economic JusticeState (computer science)Indigenous rightsLaw and economicsPolitical economySociologyLawPublic administration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

... Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a powerful ally of Indigenous peoples' efforts towards achieving the goal of individual equality within Canadian society. ... Justice for Aboriginal peoples requires that Canadians not unduly restrict their understanding of equity solely to an individual equality-seeking paradigm which excludes a broader notion of equality including the right of Indigenous nations to collective equality or inter-societal equality. ... Thus, on a more limited internal government-to-government level, subject to the overriding interests of the Canadian state, Indigenous peoples may be able to achieve a limited piece-meal level of collective political equality (providing the Aboriginal collective has the stamina and resources to constantly assert through litigation specific and narrowly defined self-government powers). ... The more frequently the court is presented with persuasive arguments that embrace an interpretation of section 35 as including the inherent right to self- government, the greater is the likelihood of furthering the interests of political equality for Indigenous nations. ... This purpose can be realized through the expansion of a second track to pursue collective political equality for Indigenous nations. ... Although the current state of Aboriginal jurisprudence under section 35 is very limited in what it can offer Indigenous nations' aspirations for greater political status and recognition, it, nonetheless, is a vehicle for furthering equality along this second track. ...HIGHLIGHTS:In this article the author argues that because section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is more attuned to the realization of individual equality rights it does not meet the aspirations of Indigenous peoples for recognition of collective equality rights. These rights are seen as being important to advance the goal of self-government for Indigenous peoples. The author then suggests that section 35 of the Constitution may be used to enhance equality rights so as to recognize collective rights of Indigenous peoples. For this to happen, one practical step would be for the Government to widen the Court Challenges Program to accommodate Aboriginal claims brought under section 35 of the Constitution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207