MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291251271 · doi:10.4324/9780203084779

Landscape and the Ideology of Nature in Exurbia

2013· book· en· W2291251271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyGeographyEnvironmental ethicsEcologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyBiologyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction: Sprawl and the Ideology of Nature Laura Taylor and Kirsten Valentine Cadieux 2. Bridges in the Cultural Landscape: Crossing Nature in Exurbia Laura Taylor 3. Exurbia Meets Nature: Environmental Ideals for a Rootless Society Richard Judd 4. Airworld, the Genius Loci of Exurbia Andrew Blum 5. Rewilding Walden Woods and Reworking Exurban Woodlands: Higher Uses in Thoreau Country Brian Donahue 6. Sojourning in Nature: The Second-Home Exurban Landscapes of Ontario's Near North Nik Luka 7. Design and Conservation in Quebec City's Rural-Urban Fringe: The Case of Lac-Beauport Genevieve Vachon and David Paradis 8. Time, Place, and Structure: Typo-Morphological Analysis of Three Calgary Neighborhoods Bev Sandalack and Andrei Nicolai 9. The Imagined Landscape: Language, Metaphor, and the Environmental Movement Thomas Looker 10. The Mortality of Trees in Exurbia's Pastoral Modernity: Challenging Conservation Practices to Move Beyond Deferring Dialogue About the Meanings and Values of Environments Kirsten Valentine Cadieux Editors' Epilogue: An Agenda for Addressing Green Sprawl Laura Taylor and Kirsten Valentine Cadieux

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207