MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2291494738 · doi:10.14288/1.0101400

Temporal and spatial differences in movement of cutthroat trout in Placid Lake, British Columbia

2011· article· en· W2291494738 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruce Gordon Shepherd

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroutMovement (music)GeographyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>BiologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporal and spatial variations in the activity of cutthroat trout in a small coastal British Columbia lake (49°19'N, 122°34’W) were examined in order to determine the Impact of activity on the production of fish, and the factors controlling activity. Sonar tracking, diving, netting and tagging, rise observation, stomach content-prey distribution comparision, and echo sounding were used in the Investigation. Average activity levels were at least an order of magnitude below any published values. Energy values were correspondingly low; the maximum estimate of annual energy expenditure in activity (including routine metabolism) was 2330 kCal/kg/yr, which is well below the accepted 'rule' of field metabolism being twice the routine metabolism (3860 kCal/kg/yr). Fish behavioral problems and methodological shortcomings are considered responsible for this result. Activity over 5 min intervals was quite variable. Daily activity peaked during dawn and dusk. The level of activity decreased in late fall and early spring, and there was a shift from the littoral zones during summer. The cutthroat in the lake appear to maintain home ranges-for up to 5 months. Factors affecting activity can be broken into 3 categories: Temperature, light, and oxygen primarily determine the depth zones that are accessible to fish. Substrates such as Potamogeton beds and logs may act to concentrate fish within accessible depth zones; attraction is likely due to the higher food levels and/or increased cover found in these areas. Bottom slope, by affecting foraging efficiency in the productive littoral areas, might also affect the summer offshore distribution of fish within an accessible depth zone. It is suggested that the indirect effects of activity (specifically, the offshore movement of fish in summer) can be equally or even more important to the production of fish than is the direct use of energy for activity. higher food levels and/or increased cover found in these areas. Bottom slope, by affecting foraging efficiency in the productive littoral areas, might also affect the summer offshore distribution of fish within an accessible depth zone. It is suggested that the indirect effects of activity (specifically, the offshore movement of fish in summer) can be equally or even more important to the production of fish than is the direct use of energy for activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→