MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2291762295 · doi:10.18785/gcr.1701.02

Fishery and Biology of Blackfin Tuna Thunnus atlanticus off Northeastern Brazil

2005· article· en· W2291762295 on OpenAlexaff
Kátia Meirelles Felizola Freire, Rosângela Paula Teixeira Lessa, Jorge Eduardo Lins-Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueGulf and Caribbean Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsFisheryFish measurementFishingBiologyReproductionReproductive biologyRecreational fishingPopulationTunaThunnusStock assessmentAnimal scienceFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blackfin tuna, Thunnus atlanticus, is the target species of a handline artisanal fishery off northeastern Brazil in September–January, but it is also caught by anglers and as by-catch in industrial fisheries. The population structure, morphometric relationships, mortality, reproduction, and fishery dynamics were studied during 2 fishing seasons (1996 and 1997). The maximum length and weight observed were 87 cm FL and 10 kg Wd, respectively. Males were larger and predominant (1.9:1). The length at 50% maturity was 49.8 cm FL for females and 52.1 cm FL for males. This species uses the area for reproduction, although a spawning peak was not observed. The length at first capture (58.1 cm FL) was higher than the length at 50% maturity. The total, natural, and fishing mortality rates were 2.34, 0.94, and 1.40 year-1, respectively. The total length-fork length and the total length-standard length relationships were TL = 1.35369 + 1.0462 FL and TL = 6.37742 + 1.0544 SL, respectively (sexes grouped). The length-weight relationship estimated for both sexes was Wd = 0.00003 FL2.8569. Annual catches decreased from 154 t year-1 in the 1970s to 33.5 t year-1 in the 1990s. It seems that there was not much change in the structure of this stock after 30 years, but the lack of a proper collection system of catch data and the increasing interest in recreational fisheries raise reasons for concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGulf and Caribbean ResearchSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207