The Effect of Bacteria on Seed Germination in Sorghum and Rape Under Cadmium and Petroleum Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mental health issues represent a significant health problem among competitive athletes. Though seeking help from professional sources (e.g., counselors) is important for mental wellbeing, athletes have reported several barriers to help-seeking. In particular, athletes are situated in hypercompetitive contexts and often report that they believe help-seeking is socially unacceptable and/or uncommon (i.e., negative social norm perceptions). The present study investigated whether social norms from several important normative referents including coaches, teammates, parents, and friends were associated with athletes’ intentions to seek help for mental health concerns. Survey data from 290 college athletes in the US and Canada were analyzed. After accounting for attitudes, stigma, and past help-seeking experience, perceptions that their parents would seek help for mental health concerns were positively associated with athletes’ own intentions to seek help, b = .14, p = .006. Moderation analyses showed that the relationship between athletes’ perceptions of their teammates’ help-seeking and their own help-seeking intentions was stronger under conditions of lower perceptions of approval from teammates, interaction b = -.08, p = .046. This interaction suggests that athletes’ perceptions of their teammates’ help-seeking for mental health concerns may relate to their own intentions to seek help only if it is unclear whether their teammates explicitly approve help-seeking. Overall, the findings highlight that although college athletes are legally of the age of majority, parents may still have an important influence on athletes’ help-seeking, and that teammates’ approval may also be an important factor for help-seeking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".