Molecular studies of the structure and function of pseudomonas aeruginosa OprD: an imipenem specific porin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprD is a specific porin which facilitates the uptake of basic amino acids and imipenem, a carbapenem antibiotic with high potency against P. aeruginosa. To permit further studies of OprD, the oprD structural gene was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli on a 2.1-kb BamHI/KpnI fragment. DNA sequencing predicted a 420 amino acid mature OprD protein with a 23 amino acid signal peptide. In addition, a putative oprD regulatory gene opdE was sequenced, which predicted a hydrophobic protein of 402 amino acids. A set of P. aeruginosa isogenic strains with genetically defined levels of OprD were constructed and utilized to characterize the in vivo function of OprD. The results clearly demonstrated that OprD could be utilized by imipenem and meropenem but, even when substantially overexpressed, could not be significantly utilized by other ß-lactams, quinolones or aminoglycosides. Regarding its function in uptake of nutrients, OprD selectively facilitated the diffusion of basic amino acids and gluconate under growth-rate limiting conditions. Competition experiments confirmed that imipenem shared common binding sites with basic amino acids in the OprD channel, but not with gluconate or glucose. In vitro functional studies using purified OprD provided direct evidence for the presence of a specific binding site(s) for imipenem in the OprD channel, with an I₅₀ value of 1.4 µM. An OprD topology model was proposed based on sequence alignment with E. coli porin OmpF and structure predictions. Sixteen ß-strands were predicted, connected by short turns at the periplasmic side, whereas the eight external loops were of variable length but tended to be much longer. In addition, multiple sequence alignments between OprD and seven representatives from the porin superfamily indicated that OprD was the first specific porin that could be aligned with members of the so-called porin superfamily. PCR-based site directed mutagenesis was performed to separately delete short stretches (4-8) of amino acid residues from each of the predicted external loops. Six out of eight mutants expressed in both E. coli and P. aeruginosa, maintained substantial resistance to trypsin treatment in the context of outer membranes, and formed functional channels, which supported the general accuracy of the model. The loop 2 deletion mutant only partially reconstituted sup ersusceptibility to imipenem in an OprD defective background, and showed much lower affinity to imipenem in the macroscopic conductance inhibition experiment, indicating its involvement in iniipenem binding. Deletions in loops 5, 7 or 8 resulted in a channel with enhanced permeability to antibiotics, but which retained the imipenem binding site(s). A model of the channel architecture of OprD was constructed based on these data, and the mechanism by which imipenem and basic amino acids pass through the OprD channel was discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".