MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292051103 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.105048

Radiation from an emitter in the ghost free scalar theory

2016· article· en· W2292051103 on OpenAlexafffund
Valeri P. Frolov, Andrei Zelnikov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam TrustsDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhysicsScalar fieldPropagatorMassless particleMonochromatic colorFree fieldAmplitudeScalar (mathematics)Common emitterField theory (psychology)Field (mathematics)Quantum electrodynamicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study radiation emitted by a time-dependent source of a scalar massless field in the framework of the ghost-free modifications of the theory. We consider a simple model of the emitter: namely, we assume that it is point-like and monochromatic. We focus on the most common versions of the ghost-free theory, where the propagator ${\ensuremath{\square}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ is modified as follows: $\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}(\ensuremath{\square}/{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{2}{)}^{N}){\ensuremath{\square}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, where $\ensuremath{\mu}$ is the characteristic mass scale of such a $G{F}_{N}$ theory. We demonstrate that far from the source, in the wave zone, the radiation asymptotically converges to its ``classical'' value for any $N\ensuremath{\ge}1$. However, in the near zone the behavior of the field is quite different from the ``classical'' case. The difference of the field amplitude for the ghost-free field and for the classical one has an oscillatory behavior in this domain. The number of oscillations increases with $N$. The amplitude of these oscillations remains finite for even $N$, while it infinitely grows with frequency for odd $N$. This behavior indicates that even in the classical domain $G{F}_{N}$ theories might have pathological behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207