MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2292088341

Modelling the hydrology of an agricultural watershed in Quebec using slurp

2002· article· en· W2292088341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Romero, C.A. Madramootoo And P. Enright

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowmeltWatershedSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceEvapotranspirationRunoff curve numberHydrological modellingClimatologyGeologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Romero, D., Madramootoo, C.A. and Enright, P. 2002. Modelling the hydrology of an agricultural watershed in Quebec using SLURP. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le genie des biosystemes au Canada 44:1.11-1.20. Five years (1994-1998) of climatic and hydrologic data recorded on the small Ruisseau Saint Esprit agricultural watershed, located 50 km north of Montreal, Quebec, served to calibrate and validate the SLURP hydrological model. A Geographical Information System was used to store, analyze, and export the watershed information to the model. SLURP was calibrated with data recorded from 1994 to 1996 using an automatic calibration technique. The Nash/Sutcliffe coefficient of performance obtained through the automatic calibration feature of SLURP was 0.522 for daily runoff. Model validation was carried out by comparing predicted and measured daily, monthly, seasonal, and annual runoff using data from 1997 and 1998. Model validation using daily data yielded Nash/Sutcliffe coefficients of 0.659 (acceptable) and 0.483 (low) for 1997 and 1998, respectively. Hydrologic outputs predicted by the model on an annual basis (evapotranspiration, snowmelt and runoff) were acceptable, but runoff was over-predicted. On a seasonal basis, the model predicted runoff well during the non-growing season, but poorly over the growing season. SLURP-predicted actual ET compared well with the ETcorn predicted by the Baier and Robertson model. Timing of peak snowmelt-runoff was in most cases simulated within one or two days of the observed peak runoff, but runoff from snowmelt was greatly underpredicted by SLURP. This may be in part related to the lack of on-watershed spatially distributed measures of snow pack depth and snow-water equivalence, but also may be related to the inflexibility of the model to parameter tweaking after the autocalibration. Overall, the present study suggests that, with additional data, SLURP could be used for long-term estimates of the hydrology of the Saint Esprit watershed. Cinq ans (1994-1998) de donnees climatiques et hydrologiques enregistrees sur le petit bassin versant du Ruisseau Saint Esprit, 50 km au nord de Montreal, Quebec, servirent a calibrer et valider le modele hydrologique SLURP. L'information decrivant le bassin versant fut stockee, analysee et exportee au modele en utilisant un SIG. Le modele fut calibre par une technique d'optimisation automatique, utilisant trois ans de donnees (1994-96). Le coefficient de performance Nash/Sutcliffe (R) d'apres calibration fut de 0.522. Le modele fut valide en comparant l'ecoulement observe et l'ecoulement simule pour les annees 1997 et 1998, sur une base annuelle, saisonniere, mensuelle et quotidienne. Pour 1997 et 1998, sur une base quotidienne, des coefficients (R) de 0.659 (acceptable) et de 0.483 (bas), respectivement, furent obtenus. Les variables hydrologiques etudiees furent: l'ET, la fonte des neiges et l'ecoulement. L'ET simule par SLURP et l' ETmais simule par le modele Baier et Robertson ne furent pas sensiblement differents. Pour l'ET et la fonte les predictions furent acceptables, mais l'ecoulement fut largement surestime. Sur une base saisonniere, le modele performa bien hors-saison, mais mal durant la saison de culture. La synchronisation des niveaux maximums de fonte des neiges et d'ecoulement furent simules, dans la plupart des cas a un ou deux jours pres de l'ecoulement maximal observe. Cependant l'ecoulement provenant de la fonte fut fortement sous-estime. Cette erreur pourrait etre reliee en partie au manque d'une distribution spatiale de donnees d'epaisseur du manteau nival et d'equivalence neige-eau sur le bassin versant. Cette erreur pourrait aussi etre reliee a l'inflexibilite du modele aux ajustements des parametres apres l'autocalibration. Nos resultats suggerent qu'avec des donnees additionnelles, SLURP pourrait servir a l’estimation a long terme de l'hydrologie du petit basin versant de Saint-Esprit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→