MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2292193113 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a2993

Abstract 2993: Effects of Education and Immediate Feedback on Improved rt-PA Door-to-Needle Time

2012· article· en· W2292193113 on OpenAlexaff
Janice Taulli-Lasseigne, Kellen Ryno, Kimberly Mathisen, Mary Subervielle

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Emergency departmentTriageEmergency medicineArrival timePsychological interventionMedical emergencyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & Issues: The American Stroke Association reports earlier administration of intravenous rt-PA following symptom onset is associated with greater functional recovery. The Target: Stroke Campaign has identified a door-to-needle goal of 60 minutes or less. Our adoption of the Target: Stroke guidelines led to the improvement of emergency staff awareness and interventions for immediate feedback and correction of misperceptions of goal time for rt-PA administration and improved results. Purpose: To improve door-to-needle time to 60 minutes or less. Methods: In April 2010, we initiated a process to improve door-to-needle time for rt-PA administration within 60 minutes of arrival to Emergency Department (ED) for anyone presenting with indication of stroke. Target: Stroke guidelines are implemented for initial patient evaluation within 10 minutes of arrival to ED, stroke team activation within 15 minutes of arrival, CT scan within 25 minutes of arrival, and interpretation of CT scan within 45 minutes. First responders notify the Emergency Department of a possible stroke patient enroute. The triage nurse activates the Stroke Team through mass paging the team members. The Stroke Team Nurse assesses the patient, determines the onset of symptom time and possible rt-PA exclusions, follows the patient to CT Scan notifying the neurologist of CT scan results, and initiates the immediate discussion between the Emergency Physician and neurologist to determine if rt-PA is appropriate. If rt-PA is administered, immediate feedback is given to all stroke team members using a door-to-needle tracking form. All time delays are reviewed by the Stroke Team Medical Director to determine causes for delay. The Stroke Team meets to determine where improvements can be made. Results: From April 2010 through June 2011, door-to-needle time was decreased from 107.75 minutes to 52 minutes per quarter average. Conclusions: Improvements were realized following the extensive education of the Emergency Department with clarification of door-to-needle goal. This resulted in the ED staff’s design and implementation of a standardized process for following each stroke emergency, including early stroke team activation for patients presenting with any sign of acute stroke and the early initiation of a second intravenous line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→