MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2292389972 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3029

Abstract 3029: Improved Clinical Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Ischemic Stroke During Initial Implementation of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S) Program 2003-2008

2012· article· en· W2292389972 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Song, Gregg C. Fonarow, Wendy Pan, DaiWai M. Olson, Adrian F. Hernandez, Eric D. Peterson, Mathew J. Reeves, Eric E. Smith, Lee H. Schwamm, Jeffrey L. Saver

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Diabetes mellitusDemographicsEmergency medicineInternal medicinePhysical therapyPediatricsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The first decade of the 21st century saw several changes in acute ischemic stroke care, including greater use of statins, tobacco cessation counseling, IV rt-PA, formally organized stroke centers, and national performance improvement programs. Changes in clinical outcomes from acute ischemic stroke during this period have not been fully delineated. Methods: We examined the national Medicare dataset to analyze clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke patients at hospitals joining Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) from April 1, 2003 to December 12, 2008. We designated three time periods of interest: 1) pre-period (6 months prior to GWTG-S participation, 2) early period (first 6 months of GWTG-Stroke participation), and 3) late period (6 to 18 months after GWTG-Stroke implementation). Clinical outcomes analyzed included discharge to home; inpatient, 30 day, and 1 year mortality; and 30 day and 1 year rehospitalization for stroke, cardiovascular event, and all cause. Results: 139,293 patients from 725 sites were included in the analysis. Mean age was 79.5 years, 41% male, 84% white. Patient demographics were similar across the three time periods, with minimal differences in comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, renal disease). Statistically significant changes between pre and late periods included: lower 30 day mortality (15.3% vs. 13.0%, p<.0001), lower 1 year mortality (28.0% vs 25.5%, p<.0001), lower stroke/TIA rehospitalization at 30 days (3.1% vs. 2.4%, p<.0001) and 1 year (9.2% vs. 8.7%, p<.002), lower rehospitalization for cardiovascular event at 30 days (2.9% vs. 2.3%, p<.0001) and 1 year (15.9% vs. 13.5%, p<.0001), and lower all cause rehospitalization at 30 days (17.4% vs. 15.1%, p<.0001) and 1 year (55.8% vs. 53.0%, p<.0001). Intermediate changes were seen during the early period. Rates of inpatient mortality and discharge to home did not change. Conclusions: During the first 2 years of participation, clinical outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke among hospitals joining GWTG-Stroke improved substantially, with 15% lower 30 day mortality rates and 24% lower 30 day rehospitalization rates for stroke or TIA. Further study is planned to determine if similar improvements in outcomes occurred at non-participating hospitals during this time frame.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→