MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292423638

PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT BY ORGANOCLAY ADSORPTION AND DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION

2015· dissertation· en· W2292423638 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Muhammad Rizwan Faisal

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPetroleum Technology Research CentreUniversity of Regina
KeywordsOrganoclayAdsorptionAir waterWater treatmentChemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringPhysicsMontmorillonite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global demand of energy is increasing due to population growth and industrial development. There will be an increase of 56 % in energy consumption between 2010 and 2040 from 524 quadrillion Btu to 630 quadrillion Btu (IEO, 2013). However the production process generates a large quantity of produced water (PW) which consists also of toxic, persistent and carcinogenic constituents. In this research, organoclay adsorption in stirred tank was integrated with Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) for the treatment of synthetic produced water. Experiments were divided into four sections: Control Experiments (only DAF), Screening Experiments (Screening of OC from Jenfitch LLC, Ecologix environmental systems and Clear creek systems Inc), Optimization Experiments (OC adsorption as pretreatment for DAF), and Optimization Experiments (OC adsorption as post-treatment for DAF). Results of control experiments indicate that the oil removal for 10 % and 20 % recycle ratios (RRs) were 88 and 84 mg/l as compared to the feed of 196 mg/l. Therefore, DAF alone is not able to remove oil constituents below the discharge limits. In the screening experiments, OC from Jenfitch LLC shows the best results in terms of oil, turbidity, COD and TOC removal reaching 93.3, 99.3, 88.4 and 96 %, respectively. Optimization experiments with this organoclay were done with different doses. For each dose, the recycle ratio was varied from 10 to 20 %, in order to determine the optimum combination of organoclay dose and recycle ratio. Performances of optimization experiments were much better than the control experiments in which only DAF was used. The oil contents were below the discharge limits in all the optimization experiments ranging from 25.3 to 1.8 mg/l with OC adsorption as pre-treatment for DAF, and 16.2 to 0.2 mg/l with OC adsorption as post treatment for DAF. Therefore, results for the optimization experiments with OC adsorption as post treatment to DAF were better than those for the pretreatment experiments. Removal percentages were 91.7, 96.8, 83.6 and 88.6 % for oil, turbidity, COD and TOC, respectively at an organoclay dose of 100 mg/l and a recycle ratio of 10 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)Same topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207