MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 3: Patient Satisfaction and Healthcare Service Utilization Following Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome

2016· article· en· W2292479233 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marisa Okano, Roxanne Pelletier, Hassan Behlouli, Louise Pilote

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute coronary syndromePatient satisfactionHealth careCohortProspective cohort studyDepression (economics)Internal medicineEmergency medicineMyocardial infarctionSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives. Patient centered care is recognized as central to a high-quality healthcare system. Satisfaction with healthcare services may be differentially experienced among young adults suffering from heart disease. The current study examined the association between patient satisfaction with healthcare services, utilization, and clinical outcomes in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods and Results. We used data from 1033 patients (≤ 55 years) hospitalized for ACS and enrolled into the prospective cohort study, GENESIS-PRAXY (GENdEr and Sex determInantS of cardiovascular disease: from bench to beyond PRemature Acute Coronary SYndrome). Participants were recruited between January 2009-April 2013, from 24 centers across Canada, 1 in the US, and 1 in Switzerland. Patient satisfaction with treatment and subsequent healthcare service utilization/clinical outcomes were assessed within 12 months post-index ACS through questionnaire and medical chart review. The median age of our cohort was 48 years and 30% were female. Ninety two percent of males and females reported high satisfaction with healthcare services; however, among patients with low satisfaction we observed lower social support (48% vs. 24%; p<.0001) and higher rates of depression (46% vs. 22%; p<.0001) at baseline. Multivariable Cox regressions adjusted for patient characteristics and clinical risk factors indicated lower risk of cardiac ER visits (HR=0.56; 95%CI, 0.34-0.93; P=0.01) and cardiac rehospitalization (HR=0.55; 95%CI, 0.28-1.07; P=0.08) among patients with higher satisfaction. There was no association between patient satisfaction level and risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (HR=0.61; 95% CI, 0.32-1.19 P=0.15). Conclusions. Patients with lower satisfaction with healthcare services at index ACS were more likely to visit the ER and to be rehospitalized for cardiac reasons. Patient satisfaction level was not associated with risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Our results suggest that the younger ACS population may be a tangible target for reducing healthcare utilization through increased patient satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207