MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W229266598 · doi:10.1520/stp13410s

The Effect of Biaxial Strain Ratio and Periodic Compressive Overstrains on Fatigue Crack Growth Mode and Crack Growth Rate

2000· book-chapter· en· W229266598 on OpenAlexaff
A. Varvani‐Farahani, T. H. Topper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceParis' lawCrack closureStructural engineeringComposite materialStrain (injury)Growth rateMode (computer interface)Fracture mechanicsEngineeringMathematicsComputer scienceGeometryAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biaxial fatigue tests were performed on thin-walled tubular 1045 steel specimens in a test fixture that applied internal and external pressure and axial load. There were two test series, one in which constant amplitude fully reversed strains were applied and another in which large periodic compressive strain cycles causing strains normal to the crack plane were inserted in a constant amplitude history of smaller strain cycles. Ratios of hoop strain to axial strain of λ = - 1 (pure shear), λ = -0.625, λ = - v (uniaxial straining), and λ = +1 (equibiaxial straining) were used in each test series. A confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) image processing technique that gave a resolution of 0.25 μm was developed and used to obtain three-dimensional images of small cracks as they were opened under load. The information in the images was used to construct cross sections of cracks from which crack depth, shape and crack opening stress were obtained. For pure shear straining tests (λ = -1) and for tests at a strain ratio of λ - 0.625 surface cracks rapidly initiated on planes of maximum shear in both constant amplitude and overstrain tests but did not increase significantly in length until near the end of the tests. Instead they grew into the specimen until they were semi-circular in shape. This phase occupied approximately 90% of the fatigue life. Then they began to grow in length as well as depth and linked up to cause failure. In the uniaxial and equibiaxial straining tests, crack growth initiated on planes of maximum shear at 45° to the surface of the specimens (Stage I crack growth) before changing to Stage II growth perpendicular to the applied stress. The cracks once initiated grew continuously in both the length and depth direction until failure took place. The magnitude and frequency of application of the periodic compressive overstrain cycles in the second test series was chosen to reduce the crack opening stress level below the minimum stress level of the constant amplitude cycles so that they experienced closure-free crack growth. The compressive overstrains significantly increased crack growth rates and decreased the threshold strain intensity for the smaller constant amplitude cycles. They also caused a large decrease in the small cycle fatigue resistance as measured by their equivalent strain-life curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207