Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formal break in our ‘connection’ to the natural world, by virtue of the barriers we construct to enclose space and control our environment, and the constant effort to embody that connection back into the built environment while accommodating the essential needs of the inhabitant, is rationalized through the rigorous integration of art and technology in architecture. This is an ongoing dialogue of inquiry, encompassing exploration and experimentation of and between the disciplines of science –the pragmatic real of technology– and culture –the emergent real of the idea– and takes place throughout the entire process of the architectural ‘event’: inspiration, technology and process, acting on or reacting to what exists or what has come before and what it now aspires to be, as matter fuses in time and space as an ‘event’ or a ‘series of events’ of architecture. Successful design examples of sustainable technology, as a portion of the process of inquiry that is architecture, are best in those examples in which art and technology come to embody the other without detrimental affects to the surrounding eco-system and, as such, reveal a promise for new adaptations, topological modulations and emergent potentialities of progress to those who follow. Architects must address the issue of ‘sustainable architecture’ as a ‘holistic’ approach to the integration of sustainable technologies into meaningful forms. The architecture of American Frank Lloyd Wright and Canadian James W. Strutt are offered as examples of the ‘Praxis of Inquiry’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.134 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.025 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".