Crawling ResearchGate.net to Measure Student/Supervisor Collaboration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResearchGate.net is an academic social network that aims to facilitate knowledge sharing and academic collaboration through publication upload and download, questions and answers, and other mechanisms. In this paper we have collected data about the collaboration of Canadian Computer Science researchers, first through a quantitative exploration of student/supervisor collaboration on joint publications, and second, through a quantitative exploration of other collaboration mechanisms. Our results indicate that researchgate.net does indeed facilitate collaboration, but also finds some interesting properties of the available facilities of the social network platform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.110 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it