MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2292877862 · doi:10.18192/clg-cgl.v5i1-2.1465

Cultural Planning in the Eastern Pori Suburbs: Applicability of the Approach?

2015· article· en· W2292877862 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture and Local Governance · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)GeographyInfrastructure planningSociologyPolitical scienceEnvironmental planningArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes an attempt to apply cultural planning in a group of high-rise suburbs with an aging population in the mid-size city of Pori, on the West Coast of Finland. First, the background of the project and the motive for adopting a cultural planning approach is explained. A preceding pilot study on cultural planning in Finland is described, providing background information about the recent spread of the approach into the country and the current state of cultural planning processes. Second, the starting points and conceptual framework of the cultural planning project are briefly discussed in the light of research literature. After that, the objectives of the cultural mapping phase and the baseline studies linked with it are elaborated. Cultural resources of the Eastern Pori suburbs, as identified in the mapping, are analyzed. Prescriptions for cultural development follow, based on collaborative planning and focusing on public spaces and community art in the Eastern suburbs. Finally, the further applicability of cultural planning in the Finnish context is assessed, judging from the Pori experience.Keywords: cultural planning, cultural mapping, co-creation, suburbs, FinlandRésumé: Cet article met en relief l’expérience de la mise en oeuvre d’un projet de planification culturelle à Pori (en Finlande), une banlieue de taille moyenne, à la population vieillissante et caractérisée par ses nombreux gratte-ciels. Après avoir discuté du contexte entourant ce projet, cet article aborde les tentatives de planification culturelle antérieures à ce projet tout en situant ce projet en rapport à d’autres expériences de planification culturelle réalisées en Finlande. Après avoir mis en évidence les grandes orientations théoriques appuyant le propos de cet article, le cas de la partie est de la ville de Pori est analysé et les données de la cartographie culturelle sont mises en évidence. Cet article apporte de nombreux constats qui participent à alimenter le débat et à enrichir la pratique de la planification culturelle en Finlande.Mots clé: planification culturelle, cartographie culturelle, co-création, la banlieue, Finlande

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it