The admission of Eastern Catholics to the Novitiate of Latin Religious INstitutes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'admission des fideles catholiques de rite oriental au noviciat d'instituts religieux latins exige une etude comparative des codes latin et oriental que le pape considere comme deux parties constituant lunique Corpus inris canonici de I'Eglise. Ense basantsurle canon 1 do CCFO, lA. examinepremierement les canons do GOFO! GIGqui concernent expressement (explicitement) les soperieurs majeors lacios ayant admettre des catholiques orientaux au noviciat. De pius, les canons caracteristiques 451 et 517, §2 do GOFO, qoi exigent un indult do Saint-Siege pour l'admission licite de candidats au noviciat don institut religieux done cutre Eglise sui jons, affectent aussi expressement (implicitement) l'Eglise latine. L'A. examine ces normes orientales ainsi que lene interpretation et application par la Oongregation pone les Eglises orientales. Paree que ces candidats orientaox demeurent inscrits 6 lene propre Eglise et rite d'origine (GOFO, e. 38), d'autres normes do GOFO concerneront expressement (ex natura rei) les soperieors majeors lacios ayant O admettre des catholiqoes orientaox llenes institots. Soulevant une question d'interpretation, lA. note que le canon 450 do GOFO prescrit deux emplchements qoi ne figurent pas dans le OJO concernant l'admission valide su noviciat. Etant donne que les orientaux sont lies aox luis de lene Ocde pone lene admission, lA. conclut que le canon 450 do GOFO, non le canon 643 do OJO, sappliqoe aux candidats orientaux pour lene admission valide. Le canon 452 do GOFO etablit aossi cinq autres empechements affectant lene admission licite a un noviciat de rite latin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".