Tobacco use among school enrolled and no enrolled adolescent in Medellin, Colombia. A population survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background:Tobacco use among adolescents is a problematic risk behavior with early age of onset and consequences in health outcomes in adulthood. Objectives: Estimate the prevalence of tobacco use among adolescents at school and off school. Methods: A community-base cross sectional study was conducted during 2007 to estimate the prevalence of tobacco consumption in adolescents aged 12-15 (n=1.998), school and off school. A multistage probability sampling was conducted. Results: Life prevalence of tobacco consumption was 26.8% and currently use tobacco was 6%, the age onset was 11 years; non-enrolled in school adolescents had higher smoking rates. Majority of current smokers were able to buy cigarettes. Conclusion: Non-enrolled adolescents have more risk to tobacco use. Public policies should generate strategies to intervene this population. It is important to conduct the Global Youth Tobacco Survey in a national sample of adolescents including of school adolescents and establish an epidemiological surveillance system of risk behaviors based on surveys conducted periodically.Antecedentes:El consumo de tabaco entre los adolescentes es un comportamiento de riesgo problemática para la salud, de inicio cada vez mas temprano y afecta los resultados de salud. Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia de consumo de tabaco entre los adolescentes escolarizados y no escolarizados. Métodos: Estudio transversal de base poblacional en 2007 para estimar la prevalencia de consumo de tabaco en adolescentes de 12-15 (n = 1.998), escolarizado y no escolarizados. Se uso muestreo probabilístico pilietápico. Resultados: La prevalencia en vida de consumo de tabaco fue del 26,8% y el consumo actual de tabaco fue del 6%, la aparición de edad fue de 11 años; no inscrito en adolescentes escolares tenían mayores tasas de tabaquismo. La mayoría de los fumadores actuales fueron capaces de comprar cigarrillos. Conclusión: los adolescentes no escolarizados tuvieron más riesgo para el consumo de tabaco. Las políticas públicas deben intervenir la población no-escolarizadas. Es importante llevar a cabo la Encuesta Mundial de Tabaquismo en Jóvenes en una muestra nacional que incluya adolescentes incluyendo escolarizados y no escolarizados y establecer un sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica de las conductas de riesgo en base a encuestas realizadas periódicamente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".