Bibliographic record
Abstract
La majorité des paysages urbains d’Afrique de l’Est et du Centre-Sud ont des origines relativement récentes et l’héritage du colonialisme britannique y est encore très évident. Pourtant, les stratégies coloniale et postcoloniale du modernisme urbain n’ont rencontré que des échecs. Cet article examine deux projets gouvernementaux de modernité urbaine: la construction de Lusaka dans les années 1930; et la construction de Lilongwe au Malawi dans les années 1960 et 1970. Le concept d’encadrement de Timothy Mitchell est appliqué pour permettre de comprendre comment et pourquoi ces états ont imposé des organisations physiques de l’espace susceptibles de leur permettre d’exercer leur pouvoir sans difficulté. Les études de cas illustrent aussi la manière dont les citadins africains ordinaires ont réorganisé leur espace, à l’intérieur même des contraintes imposées par les gouvernements d’oppression. Ces réactions offrent en exemple les solutions urbaines africaines offertes aux défis des modernités, solutions qui reposent sur la promulgation des idéologies religieuses, des coutumes et du pouvoir personnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".