Analysis of infectious complications and timing for emergency liver transplantation in autoimmune acute liver failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is one of major etiologies of acute liver failure (ALF), and the survival rate without liver transplantation (LT) of patients with fulminant AIH is especially poor worldwide. We investigated the clinicopathological features of infectious complications in autoimmune ALF retrospectively and tried to determine when to continue corticosteroid (CS) treatment or abandon it for LT. METHODS: Twenty patients with autoimmune ALF, comprising five severe hepatitis, 13 fulminant hepatitis and two late onset hepatic failure, were analyzed. RESULTS: Corticosteroids were administered to 19 patients. Seventeen infectious complications were observed in 12 patients. The median (range) duration between the introduction of CS and onset of infection was 15 (10–41) days. There were no significant differences in clinicobiochemical features between patients with and without infection. Of 20 patients, eight (40%) recovered without LT, four (20%) received LT and eight (40%) died without LT. Dead or transplanted patients had more advanced liver failure on admission than recovered ones (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Two-week after the introduction of CS is a critical point for avoiding infectious complications. Therefore, we should have evaluated efficacy of CS and performed LT by then at the latest in case of failure to improve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".