MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2293606073 · doi:10.5539/jas.v8n4p26

Analysis of Leaf Area Index Dynamic and Grain Yield Components of Intercropped Wheat and Maize under Straw Mulch Combined with Reduced Tillage in Arid Environments

2016· article· en· W2293606073 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wen Yin, Qiang Chai, Yao Guo, Fuxue Feng, Cai Zhao, Aizhong Yu, Falong Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSpecial Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public InterestGansu Agricultural UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMonocultureIntercroppingMulchAgronomyStrawYield (engineering)TillageMathematicsPlastic filmAridBiologyChemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge on effect of yield formation under straw combined with plastic film mulch is important in highlighting the importance of cultivating high-efficient and high-yield crops in the arid environments. In this study, we developed a ‘double-mulching’ system, i.e., plastic film coupled with straw mulch, integrated together with intensified strip intercropping. We determined (i) the responses of leaf area index improvement to the integrated double mulching system, and (ii) Its effects on yield formation process and mechanism of intercropped wheat and maize under the integrated systems. Experiments were carried out in northwest China in 2009 to 2011. Results showed that wheat-maize strip intercropping in combination with plastic film and straw covering on the soil surface (i.e., NTS) increased maize yield by 27 to 42% compared to conventional monoculture maize, and increased wheat yield by 149 to 160% compared to conventional monoculture wheat. The crops on NTS had higher harvest index of maize, an increase of 8.2 to 21.6% than that of conventional monoculture maize. NTS system increased spike number (i.e., SN) by an average of 30.4%, increased kernel number per spike (i.e., KNS) by an average of 10.8%, and increased thousand-kernel weight (i.e., TKW) by an average of 7.0% of intercropped wheat in comparison with conventional monoculture wheat. Similarly, there was an average increase of 5.7% of SN, 23.8% of KNS, and 7.5% of TKW under intercropped maize in comparison with conventional monoculture maize. Moreover, the treatment on NTS had greater leaf area index (i.e., LAI) an average increase of 64.1% than that in conventional monoculture maize. Similarly, LAI had an average increase of 29.3% than conventional monoculture wheat. Path analysis exhibited that straw mulching combined with reduced tillage increased the grain yield of intercropped wheat by improving KNS, and increased the grain yield of intercropped maize by improving SN. We conclude that the intercropping system in combination with plastic film and straw mulching can be an effective system for boosting crop productivity via improving yield components and LAI under limited resources in arid enviroments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsFrench-language works237,207