Pro‐atherogenic effects of probucol may be mediated through alterations in the coagulation system in apo E‐KO mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously shown that probucol paradoxically increases atherogenesis in apo E‐KO mice, while dietary phytosterol significantly reduce the disease in this animal model. Male apo E‐KO mice were fed with an atherogenic diet containing 9% (w/w) fat and 0.2% (w/w) cholesterol in the presence of either 2% (w/w) dietary phytosterol mixture (phytosterol‐treated group, n=8), or 1% (w/w) probucol (probucol‐treated group, n=8) or nothing (control group, n=8) for 18 weeks. Plasma total cholesterol levels were significantly decreased in both treated groups as compared to controls. Aortic atherosclerotic lesion size was significantly lower in the phytosterol‐treated and significantly higher in the probucol‐treated mice as compared to controls. Plasma and aortic PAI‐1 levels were significantly higher in the probucol‐treated animals as compared to controls, while these values were comparable between the phytosterol‐treated and control mice. Both DNA microarray and RT‐PCR tests showed a significant increase in the expression of F13a1 in the liver of probucol treated mice as compared to controls. These observations suggest that pro‐atherogenic effects of probucol maybe mediated through alterations in the coagulation system in this animal model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".