Quaternion-based salient region detection using scale space analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A salient region is the most distinctive part of the image that captures human's attention. Saliency detection is a fundamental characteristic of the human visual system. Finding computational models which are able to detect salient regions is a challenging task for image processing and computer vision applications. Salient regions of various sizes can be detected from different scales. Therefore, selecting the best scales is an important issue. In this paper, an efficient multi-scale method to find salient regions is proposed. In order to include more features in evaluating saliency of a pixel, feature maps are generated using components of both the RGB and YUV color spaces. These features are combined into quaternions. Detecting salient regions of different sizes is addressed by utilizing a scale space analysis. Salient regions are detected by convolving the image amplitude spectrum with a low-pass Gaussian kernel of multiple scales. To incorporate more meaningful information, more than one scale is considered based on entropy criterion. The final saliency map is generated by normalizing the weighted saliency maps of these scales. Experiments are conducted on a dataset of natural images to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Results show that the proposed method provides larger values of area under receiver operating characteristics curve, precision, recall and F-measure, in comparison to some of the state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".