MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2294278582 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.886.886

A Mechanistic Role For Mir-126, a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Microrna, In Acute Leukemias

2013· article· en· W2294278582 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Giustacchini, Silvia Nucera, Eric R. Lechman, Cristiana Fanciullo, Francesco Boccalatte, Tiziana Plati, Anna Ranghetti, Luca Vago, Massimo Bernardi, Maurilio Ponzoni, John E. Dick, Luigi Naldini, Bernhard Gentner

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellHaematopoiesisStem cellBiologyBone marrowCD19Cancer researchPopulationImmunologyHematopoietic stem cellLymphopoiesisMolecular biologyCell biologyFlow cytometryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have recently shown that miR-126 expression faithfully identifies the engrafting fraction of bone marrow (BM) and cord blood (Gentner et al, Sci Transl Med 2010), in which it regulates hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) pool size by modulating cell cycle progression (Lechman et al., Cell Stem Cell 2012). Antagonizing miR-126 expands HSC by enhancing PI3K/AKT signaling, without causing their exhaustion or transformation. By reconstituting mice with lentivirally transduced BM cells ectopically expressing miR-126, we noted differential effects in HSC and progenitors: while miR-126 overexpressing (126OE) HSC were more quiescent and outcompeted by HSC with physiologic miR-126 expression, progenitor subsets were increased in number and proliferated more upon 126OE. In particular, B lymphopoiesis was enhanced, with the appearance of 126OE-vector marked, CD45(low)CD19+Ig(-) B cell progenitors in the peripheral blood. This abnormal population was transiently observed in all 126OE (n=45), but in none of the control mice (n=30), and BM B cell precursors and progenitors from 126OE mice showed significantly reduced levels of apoptosis, as well as a differentiation block at the immature B cell stage. At least part of this effect was due to interference of miR-126 with p53 activation. Consequentially, 20-30% of 126OE mice (as compared to 0% of control mice) followed over 1 year developed vector-marked, high-grade B-cell neoplasms which resembled diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Strikingly, by using a tetracycline-regulated, conditional miR-126OE vector, we observed full regression of the expanded abnormal B cell population after switching miR-126 expression off by doxycycline administration, demonstrating that miR-126 is an oncogenic driver in hematologic malignancies. To establish the relevance of miR-126 in human disease, we studied primary samples from patients with acute leukemia. We measured miR-126 expression in blasts from 12 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). miR-126 was highly expressed in all studied cases of ALL (Phil+: n=7, Phil-: n=5), often surpassing the levels found in normal HSC. Unlike in HSC, miR-126 expression was independent from expression of its host gene EGFL7, suggesting an ALL-specific regulation of the miR-126 locus. By exploiting a lentiviral miR-126 reporter vector, we quantified miR-126 activity with single cell resolution after xenotransplantation of miR-126 reporter vector transduced ALL blasts into NSG mice. In 7 out of 12 ALL cases, we identified distinct subpopulations exhibiting different levels of miR-126 activity, and miR-126 (hi) ALL cells were more frequently contained in the CD34+ cell fraction. Moreover, high miR-126 expression correlated with faster and higher ALL engraftment in NSG mice. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), miR-126 is significantly enriched in leukemic stem cells (LSC) where it governs quiescence and chemotherapy resistance (see abstract by Lechman et al), and analogous studies in ALL are ongoing. To further substantiate the role of miR-126 in AML, we studied miR-126 activity in 11 primary AML cases (4 AML with CBF, core binding factor, mutations; 7 AML with normal karyotype) using the reporter vector technology and the NSG xenotransplantation model. Globally, we found highest miR-126 activity in CBF-mutated AML. However, there was substantial heterogeneity in subpopulations of each single disease. Significantly higher miR-126 levels were found in CD34+, and particularly in CD34+CD38- AML cells, a fraction that is enriched for LSC. To see whether there is a correlation between miR-126 expression and disease progression, we measured miR-126 levels in sorted blasts from paired diagnosis/relapse (n=6) and diagnosis/chemotherapy-refractory (n=8) patient samples. Strikingly, we found a significant up-regulation of miR-126 in the disease progression sample, suggesting a mechanistic role for miR-126 in AML persistence after chemotherapy. In summary, these data support a clinically relevant role of miR-126 in the pathogenesis, treatment response and progession of acute leukemias. Authors AG and SN contributed equally, and LN and BG contributed equally. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→