MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294496593

Steep increase in prescribed opioids in the Netherlands. Are we going the same way as the U.S.

2015· article· nl· W2294496593 on OpenAlex
Jan van Amsterdam, H. H. C. Wartenberg, W van den Brink

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank · 2015
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOpioidCompromiseMedical prescriptionPain controlOpioid abuseVigilance (psychology)Opioid-Related DisordersOpioid epidemicPsychiatryIntensive care medicineAnesthesiaPharmacologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The U.S. and Canada are experiencing an on-going opioid epidemic, with a growing number of opioid-addicted patients and fatal overdoses. We discuss the similarities and differences between the Netherlands and the U.S. in the prescription, use and abuse of opioid analgesics. We conclude that a similar situation is not anticipated in the Netherlands despite the large increase in the use of opioid analgesics. Vigilance is advisable, but this may not and should not compromise adequate pain control. Language: nl

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0090.003
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it