Recovery of adrenal function after chronic secondary adrenal insufficiency in patients with hypopituitarism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported recovery of secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) in patients with pituitary disorders, generally immediately after pituitary surgery; however, data regarding recovery of long-term SAI are lacking. We conducted a study to assess the longer term recovery rate of SAI in patients with pituitary disorders. METHODS: We identified all SAI patients in the Halifax Neuropituitary Database from 1 November 2005 to 30 September 2014, who had required glucocorticoid therapy for ≥3 months, and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Patients with ACTH-secreting adenomas, those receiving glucocorticoids only in the routine peri-operative period for pituitary surgery and those on glucocorticoids for nonpituitary conditions were excluded. SAI was defined as either basal serum cortisol < 130 nm and/or a subnormal cortisol response to ACTH-(1-24) stimulation test or insulin tolerance test response. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients fulfilled the criteria. Nine (17·6%) patients had complete recovery of SAI over a median of 20 months (range: 8-51) after initiating glucocorticoid replacement. Patients with smaller tumour size had increased likelihood of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis recovery, whereas those with secondary hypogonadism or growth hormone deficiency were less likely to recover. Those with initial cortisol >175 nm had an almost one in two chance of recovery. CONCLUSION: Results from our study show that approximately one in six patients with SAI recover adrenal function, even up to 5 years after diagnosis. We recommend that patients with SAI undergo regular testing to assess recovery in order to prevent unnecessary glucocorticoid therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".