MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294685169 · doi:10.1163/1937240x-00002392

Preliminary investigation of direct age determination using band counts in the gastric mill of the blue swimmer crab (Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758) in two salt-water lakes in the Eastern Mediterranean

2015· article· en· W2294685169 on OpenAlexaff
Raouf Kilada, Nesreen K. Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crustacean Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortunus pelagicusCarapaceBiologyCrustaceanSalinityMediterranean seaMediterranean climateAnimal scienceZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), is an important component of the crustacean fisheries in Egypt. This fishery occurs mainly in two salt-water lakes in the Eastern Mediterranean, the coastal Lakes Bardaweel and Timsah, which is located about |${\rm{100\, km}}$| further south. We investigated for the first time the applicability of using growth band counts in thin sections of two gastric mill ossicles (mesocardiac and zygocardiac) as age indicator in the blue swimmer crab collected from the two lakes. There was no significant difference in band counts in thin sections of the two ossicles, although the zygo-cardiac ossicles were easier to process. Three growth bands were observed in the ossicles suggesting three years as the species life span. Meanwhile, size modal analysis suggested that the longevity of the species in the two lakes is only two years. Mean carapace width (mm) of the first two presumed year-classes obtained from the band counts and size modal analysis |${(y_1\, 72.8 }$| and |${\rm{76}}{\rm{.2\, mm}}$| and |${y_2\, 91.5}$| and |${\rm{97}}{\rm{.8\, mm}}$|⁠, respectively) were not significantly different in Lake Timsah. In Lake Bardaweel, however, the mean size observed at the first two years was different |${(y_1\, 78.5}$| and |${\rm{102}}{\rm{.2\, mm}}$| and |${y_2\, 94.5}$| and |${\rm{128}}{\rm{.0\, mm}}$| for the band count and size modal analysis, respectively). Sex-specific size-at-band counts (estimated age) was demonstrated for the species in both lakes. The models were fitted by power equations and there was no significant difference in the growth models between sexes in the two lakes. Further validation needs to be done to confirm the annual deposition of the growth bands before using the results on a routine basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crustacean BiologySame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207