MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P017: Reliability of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Evaluation of Forearm Microvascular Function

2012· article· en· W2294803146 on OpenAlexaff
Sébastien Lacroix, Mathieu Gayda, Vincent Grémeaux, Martin Juneau, Anil Nigam

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Ozone Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperaemiaCardiologyInternal medicineCuffDyslipidemiaBlood pressureForearmReactive hyperemiaOcclusionSurgeryBlood flowObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The assessment of microvascular reactivity by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was shown to be associated with cardiovascular status and the number of cardiovascular risk factors and could be of interest in cardiac or high-risk patients. However, the reliability of NIRS parameters measured at the arm has never been studied and should be known before they could be used in research and clinical settings. The aim of this study was to measure the absolute and relative reliability of the most commonly used NIRS parameters during post-occlusive hyperaemia in healthy young men. Methods: 18 healthy men (33.56±7.88 years), without any cardiovascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension, abdominal obesity, diabetes and smoking) or cardiac symptoms had their fasting microvascular function evaluated twice, on two mornings separated by at least 7 days. Briefly, NIRS optodes were placed on the brachio-radialis muscle and a pressure cuff was installed on the upper-arm of subjects and inflated at 80mm Hg over the systolic blood pressure. NIRS parameters were registered continuously for 2 minutes at rest, 5 minutes during occlusion and 5 minutes post-occlusion. NIRS parameters listed in the table below were then analyzed. Results: CV (%) SEM Pearson r ICC mVO 2 (ml/min/100g) 6.51 0.0043 0.90 0.90 Half time to O 2 Hb max (sec) 20.04 4.15 0.79 0.78 Time to O 2 Hb max (sec) 15.61 8.24 0.79 0.75 O 2 Hb max (%) 6.68 2.39 0.70 0.66 tHb max (%) 13.32 1.66 0.31 0.31 Time to tHb max (sec) 19.61 4.73 0.86 0.85 AUC O2Hb 16.15 184.01 0.83 0.83 AUC tHb 18.59 175.04 0.80 0.80 AUC HHb 20.37 159.38 0.63 0.63 mVO 2 : muscle oxygen consumption, O 2 Hb : oxyhaemoglobin, tHb: total haemoglobin and HHb: deoxyhaemoglobin Conclusion: Reliability of most NIRS parameters was strong (Half time to O 2 Hb max and Time to O 2 Hb max) and very strong (mVO 2 , Time to tHb max and AUC O 2 Hb and tHb). The Coefficient of variations were below 10% for mVO 2 , and O 2 Hb max, and between 10 and 20% for the other parameters, which is in line with previous data at the calf level in healthy subjects and peripheral artery disease patients. We can therefore conclude that NIRS parameters evaluated during brachial post-occlusive hyperaemia were reliable and can be used by physicians and investigators to establish thresholds of relevancy for NIRS parameter changes and to estimate sample sizes in clinical studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicMedical and Biological Ozone ResearchFrench-language works237,207