Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moving Target Search (MTS) is a dynamic path planning problem, where an agent is trying to reach a moving entity with a minimum path cost. Problems of this nature can be found in video games and dynamic robotics, which require fast processing time (real time). In this work, we introduce a new algorithm for this problem - the Moving Target Search with SubgoalGraphs (MTSub). MTSub is based on environment abstraction and uses Subgoal Graphs to speed up searches without giving up cost minimal paths. The algorithm is optimal with respect to the knowledge that the agent has during the search. Experimental results show that MTSub meets the requirement of real time performance (e.g., 5 microseconds per step). Compared to G-FRA*, which is the best known dynamic algorithm so far, MT-Sub is up to 29 times faster in average time per step and 186 times faster in maximum time per step. MTSub also compares fairly well against MtsCopa. Although in this case MTSub is up to 3.89 times slower in average response time and up to 6.81 times slower in maximum response time, it performed much better than MtsCopain the processing phase - up to 220,000 times faster and requiring up to 44 times less space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it