Nucleophilic substitution by amide nitrogen in the aromatic rings of [z<sub>n</sub>− H]˙<sup>+</sup>ions; the structures of the [b<sub>2</sub>− H − 17]˙<sup>+</sup>and [c<sub>1</sub>− 17]<sup>+</sup>ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptide radical cations that contain an aromatic amino acid residue cleave to give [zn - H]˙⁺ ions with [b2 - H - 17]˙⁺ and [c1 - 17](+) ions, the dominant products in the dissociation of [zn - H]˙⁺, also present in lower abundance in the CID spectra. Isotopic labeling in the aromatic ring of [Yπ˙GG](+) establishes that in the formation of [b2 - H - 17]˙⁺ ions a hydrogen from the δ-position of the Y residue is lost, indicating that nucleophilic substitution on the aromatic ring has occurred. A preliminary DFT investigation of nine plausible structures for the [c1 - 17](+) ion derived from [Y(π)˙GG](+) shows that two structures resulting from attack on the aromatic ring by oxygen and nitrogen atoms from the peptide backbone have significantly better energies than other isomers. A detailed study of [Y(π)˙GG](+) using two density functionals, B3LYP and M06-2X, with a 6-31++G(d,p) basis set gives a higher barrier for attack on the aromatic ring of the [zn - H]˙⁺ ion by nitrogen than by the carbonyl oxygen. However, subsequent rearrangements involving proton transfers are much higher in energy for the oxygen-substituted isomer leading to the conclusion that the [c1 - 17](+) ions are the products of nucleophilic attack by nitrogen, protonated 2,7-dihydroxyquinoline ions. The [b2 - H - 17]˙⁺ ions are formed by loss of glycine from the same intermediates involved in the formation of the [c1 - 17](+) ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".