A supplying partner strategy for mobile networks-based 3D streaming - proof of concept
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advances of wireless communication and mobile computing, there is a growing interest among researchers about augmented reality and streaming 3D graphics on mobile devices for training first responders to be better prepared in a case of disaster scenarios. However, several challenges need to be resolved before this technology become a commodity. One of the major difficulties in 3D streaming over thin mobile devices is related to the supplying partner strategy as it is not easy to discover the peer that has the correct information and that posses enough bandwidth to send the required data quickly and efficiently to the peers in need. In this paper, we propose a new supplying partner strategy for mobile networks-based 3D streaming. The primary goal of the work presented in this paper is first to address the thin mobile devices low storage capabilities; and second to avoid the flooding problem that most wireless mobile networks suffer from. Our proposed protocol is based on the quick discovery of multiple supplying partners, by optimizing the time required by peers to acquire data, avoiding unnecessary messages propagation and network congestion, and decreasing the latency and the network bandwidth over utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it