MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

pH Micro‐Environments Associated with Transport Activity of the Erythrocyte Membrane Cl <sup>−</sup> /HCO <sub>3</sub> <sup>−</sup> Exchanger, AE1

2008· article· en· W2295250223 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Danielle Johnson, Joseph R. Casey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryCytosolIntracellular pHBiophysicsExtracellularIon exchangeIntracellularMembraneBiochemistryNuclear chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)IonChromatographyEnzymeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cl − /HCO 3 − exchange proteins (AEs) interact with carbonic anhydrases (CAs) to maximize HCO 3 − transport. CAs catalyse the hydration of CO 2 to HCO 3 − and H + . We hypothesize that rapid AE1‐mediated HCO 3 − transport causes differences in pH between the region around AE1 and the rest of the cell (pH micro‐environments). To examine this possibility we have measured intracellular pH during HCO 3 − transport using pH‐sensitive fluorescent proteins (FPs) localized to unique cellular locations. We have identified a FP, deGFP4, that reports on pH without interference from other ions; deGFP4 had a Stern‐Volmer (Ksv) quenching constant of 5×10 7 M −1 for H + and 0.5 M −1 for Cl − . We constructed deGFP4 fusion proteins to: AE1 N‐terminus (measures pH at the cytosolic surface of AE1), the nucleoside transporter hCNT3 (a spectator protein), calnexin C‐terminus (to probe pH at the cytosolic ER surface), a GPI‐linked construct (to probe pH at the extracellular surface), and deGFP4 alone (cytosolic pH). The AE1‐deGFP4 and cytosolic deGFP4 exhibit an average transport rate of 0.5 pH units/min with an overall change in pH of 0.8 pH units. A new pH‐sensitive red FP (RFP) was recently developed and has been used as a cytosolic pH sensor, and as a fusion to hCNT3. pH was measured simultaneously in distinct regions of the cell using both GFP and RFP fusion proteins. This research is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHemoglobin structure and functionFrench-language works237,207