MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Nitric Oxide‐Mediated Growth Inhibition of an Endothelialized Tissue Engineered Aortic Valve

2008· article· en· W2295254860 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jami‐Lee Hageraats‐Boucher, Derek R. Boughner, Kem A. Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitric oxideChemistryEndotheliumIn vitroMatrigelTissue engineeringScaffoldCell biologyAnatomyBiomedical engineeringInternal medicineBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tissue engineering (TE) of aortic valves may provide an alternative to the use of non‐viable bioprosthetic replacements. Endothelialization of a TE construct is necessary to establish a non‐thrombogenic surface and has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells within the construct. Previously it has been shown that nitric oxide (NO) production by endothelial cells may be responsible for this growth inhibition. To test this hypothesis, cells scaffold constructs (CSCs) were produced consisting of radial artery cells seeded onto small intestine submucosa. After one week in culture, an analog inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, L‐iminoethyl‐L‐orthinine (L‐NIO, 100 μM) was added to either CSCs or endothelialiazed CSCs (ECSCs). Constructs were cultured for an additional week, followed by fixation and tissue thickness analysis by confocal microscopy. ECSC and CSC control groups were cultured for two weeks in the absence of L‐NIO. The presence of an endothelium (ECSCs) significantly inhibited growth of the construct, however, in the presence of L‐NIO, growth of the construct continued in a manner similar to CSCs (75.6μ m vs 55.3μm). Results suggest that the production of NO by the endothelium may be responsible for growth inhibition of the ECSCs providing a valuable tool for controlling TE valve construct thickness in vitro . Funding provided by Heart and Stroke foundation of Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→