Bibliographic record
Abstract
60 minute film written, directed and produced by Wyver. The film aims to rediscover Moore’s works through a precise visual focus on a wide range of his art. Working with a format\n\ndistinct from Illuminations' series theEYE, the film brings together images of Moore’s artwork from throughout his career with the\n\nwords of the artist, newly recorded by an actor, which are the only spoken elements. These words are drawn from interviews\n\nwith Moore and from his writings. This enables an immediate presentation of the artist’s ideas and, alongside rigorously shot\n\nimages of the art, offers insights into his working methods and intentions. The film is intended for a broad general audience\n\nachieved by digital television screenings and gallery presentations as well as by DVD sales internationally.\n\nThe film is the most comprehensive presentation of Moore's work on film. In early 2007 it was honoured as "Best Educational\n\nFilm" at the Montreal International Festival of Films on Art. The success of its format led to the production, by Wyver, of further\n\nsuch films, including The Art of Eric Gill and The Art of Francis Bacon.\n\nThe film concentrates on Moore’s art and largely eschews the biographical approach adopted by all other films about the artist.\n\nThe use throughout of Moore’s words achieves a personal and “subjective” presentation of the artist’s ideas.\n\nThe editorial content was reviewed and approved by the Henry Moore Foundation and the film was produced to full broadcast\n\nspecifications. All of the more than 400 sculptures and drawings featured in the film were filmed throughout Europe and the USA\n\nby the researcher (working with cameraperson Ian Serfontein) from the original artworks. It was important for the film that no\n\ntransparencies were used and that new images were created to present the works in as direct a manner as is feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".