MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2295413152 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/48

[O III] EMISSION AND GAS KINEMATICS IN A LYMAN-ALPHA BLOB AT<i>z</i>∼ 3.1

2013· article· en· W2295413152 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedshiftGalaxyEmission spectrumOffset (computer science)Line (geometry)Flux (metallurgy)Kinematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present spectroscopic measurements of the [O iii ] emission line from two subregions of strong Lyα emission in a radio-quiet Lyman-alpha blob (LAB). The blob under study is LAB1 at z ∼ 3.1, and the [O iii ] detections are from the two Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) embedded in the blob halo. The [O iii ] measurements were made with LUCIFER on the 8.4 m Large Binocular Telescope and NIRSPEC on 10 m Keck Telescope. Comparing the redshift of the [O iii ] measurements to Lyα redshifts from SAURON allows us to take a step toward understanding the kinematics of the gas in the blob. Using both LUCIFER and NIRSPEC we find velocity offsets between the [O iii ] and Lyα redshifts that are modestly negative or consistent with 0 km s −1 in both subregions studied (ranging from −72 ± 42– + 6 ± 33 km s −1 ). A negative offset means Lyα is blueshifted with respect to [O iii ] a positive offset then implies Lyα is redshifted with respect to [O iii ]. These results may imply that outflows are not primarily responsible for Lyman alpha escape in this LAB, since outflows are generally expected to produce a positive velocity offset. In addition, we present an [O iii ] line flux upper limit on a third region of LAB1, a region that is unassociated with any underlying galaxy. We find that the [O iii ] upper limit from the galaxy-unassociated region of the blob is at least 1.4–2.5 times fainter than the [O iii ] flux from one of the LBG-associated regions and has an [O iii ] to Lyα ratio measured at least 1.9–3.4 times smaller than the same ratio measured from one of the LBGs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→