MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2295490071

Characterization of Space Conditioning Loads for Energy Efficient Houses in Canada

2015· dissertation· en· W2295490071 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Alexandra Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsConditioningSpace (punctuation)Energy (signal processing)Architectural engineeringCharacterization (materials science)EngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis details the development of a graphical method of presenting equipment loads within a house, allowing the loads for an entire year to be presented on a psychrometric chart. These charts are called rosettes. This graphical method allows the magnitude and distribution of both the sensible and latent loads to be examined, and for changes throughout the year to be examined. The rosettes can be used to determine whether or not conventional HVAC equipment is the best equipment for maintaining occupant comfort within the house, or if different equipment must be considered. This is of particular importance in highly energy efficient houses. \n \nThe rosettes also allow the split between the sensible and latent loads to be examined. In conventional houses, the loads are dominated by sensible loads, especially sensible heating. However, it is already known that energy efficient houses require supplemental ventilation to avoid the development of moisture problems within the house. It was expected that in a highly insulated house with both heat and moisture control equipment, the loads will be dominated instead by latent loads instead of sensible. In such houses, it was expected that supplemental moisture control equipment may be required. The rosettes were used to determine if this was indeed the case. \n \nSimulations of six different houses were run using the program ESP-r, and the results \nwere used to create rosettes for each simulation. The simulations examined different constructions, an increased number of occupants, the addition of active shading control, and the use of an alternative control scheme. The sensible and latent loads for each case are examined and discussed. \n \nRosettes produced from this study showed that improving the standard of construction \nhas a significant effect on the equipment loads. However, the rosettes did not show a \ndramatic shift from sensibly dominated loads to latent dominated loads. The results show that changing the occupancy has the greatest effect on the equipment loads of the houses simulated in this study. The rosettes also show that while the shift from sensible loads to latent loads is not as dramatic as expected, there was a significant increase in the sensible cooling requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→