MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295916283

Sexual Orientation as a Human Rights Issue in Canada 1969-1985

2014· article· en· W2295916283 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philip Girard

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharterLesbianSexual orientationPersonhoodPoliticsPolitical scienceIdeologyOppressionSociologyHomosexualityLawGender studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equality is a protean concept. Even if one has taken a position on the equality of opportunity versus equality of outcomes debate, there remains the problem of deciding what equality means in particular contexts: racial equality, equality between the sexes, between those with and without mental or physical disability, and so on. Finally, there is the issue of which groups in society are entitled to "equality", whatever it may mean. Given the open-ended nature of the equality guarantees contained in section 15 of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it is clear that groups other than those specifically mentioned therein may have claims to assert. This article will address the claims of gays and lesbians to equal treatment under section 15 of the Charter. Which non-enumerated groups will be accorded Charter protection is very much a political issue. Organization, numbers, and success in the area of public opinion will all be key factors in determining which groups are recognized and which are not. During the last dozen or so years, gay and lesbian groups have come out of the shadows and entered the political arena in a determined way. They have spent a considerable amount of effort educating the public (and governments) about the discrimination and oppression which they face in all walks of life. In attempting to effect changes in the law, these groups have situated their demands within an ideology of human rights, arguing that one's sexual orientation (whether heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual) is a basic attribute of personhood which should not result in individious differential treatment in the public or private sphere. It is further argued that discrimination against gays and lesbians is based on inaccurate stereotypes, which automatically attribute to all gay persons the characteristics that have traditionally been associated with them (gay men as unreliable, lesbians as bad mothers, etc.). In this respect, the parallels with discrimination on the basis of race or sex are clear. This article will examine the Canadian experience with gay rights as a human rights issue. This material establishes the context within which section 15 will be interpreted. The following two sections will look at legal developments in Quebec and common law Canada, respectively, and the last section will look at public opinion on gay rights issues in Canada since 1969.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0270.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)Same topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207