Direct evidence of allele equivalency at the <scp><i>D</i></scp><i>lx5/6</i> locus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The retention of paralogous regulatory genes is a vertebrate hallmark and likely underpinned vertebrate origins. Dlx genes belong to a family of paralogous transcription factors whose evolutionary history of gene expansion and divergence is apparent from the gene synteny, shared exon-intron structure, and coding sequence homology found in extant vertebrate genomes. Dlx genes are expressed in a nested combination within the first pharyngeal arch and knockout studies in mice clearly point to a "Dlx code" that operates to define maxillary and mandibular position in the first arch. The nature of that code is not yet clear; an important goal for understanding Dlx gene function in both patterning and differentiation lies in distinguishing functional inputs that are paralog-specific (a qualitative model) versus Dlx family-generic (a quantitative model) and, in the latter case, the relative contribution made by each paralog. Here, multiple developmental deficiencies were identified in derivatives of the first pharyngeal arch in neonatal Dlx5/6(+/-) mice that resembled those seen in either paralog-specific null mutants. These data clearly demonstrate a substantial degree of allele equivalency and support a quantitative model of Dlx function during craniofacial morphogenesis. genesis 54:272-276, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".