ZnO QDs Deposited on Si by Sol-Gel Method: Role of Annealing Temperature on Structural and Optical Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zinc acetate, propanol, and ethanolamine are used to synthesize ZnO quantum dots (QDs) via the sol–gel method. Spin coating at 220°C is then employed to prepare ZnO thin films consist of QDs. The effects of thermal annealing temperature on the structural and optical properties of the samples are investigated. The prepared QDs are characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL). XRD patterns reveal the crystalline nature of samples existing in the hexagonal wurtzite phase. Increasing annealing temperatures bring about changes to the crystal orientation through the c-axis and increase the size of the QDs from ~10 nm to ~22 nm; this increment can be explained by a coarsening mechanism and the Ostwald ripening process. The observed broadening of X-ray peaks confirms the evolution of crystalline phases in the ZnO QDs. Quantitative analysis of size-dependent strain effects is performed through the Williamson-Hall model. The QD mean size estimated from FESEM and XRD displays high consistency. Room-temperature PL peaks of 3.37ev are attributed to the radiative recombination of electrons and holes from the ZnO QDs/Si interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".