PTH-068 The presence of perianal disease in patients with orofacial granulomatosis increases the risk of developing intestinal crohn’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Orofacial Granulomatosis (OFG) is a rare chronic inflammatory condition of unknown aetiology, characterised by lip swelling, orofacial erythema and ulceration. A proportion of OFG patients present with perianal disease in conjunction with their oral disease (‘top and tail’ disease). Perianal disease occurs in approximately one-third of Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients and is associated with significant morbidity and a more severe disease course.1Perianal disease has been shown to occur in 12% of patients with ileal CD (L1), 41–92% of colonic CD (L2) and 15% of ileocolonic disease (L3).2 Method We retrospectively analysed a database of OFG patients. Patients with perianal disease were identified and compared to patients without perianal disease. The Montreal classification was used to classify the sites of patient’s CD. We set out to determine how many of our OFG patients had concurrent perianal disease and how many of them developed intestinal CD. Results 263 patients with OFG were identified, of which 208 patients (79.09%) had OFG only and 55 patients (20.91%) had concurrent intestinal CD. 36 patients (13.69%) had intestinal CD and no perianal disease. 19 patients ((7.22%) 13 male, median age 38 (IQR 25–49)) had intestinal CD and concurrent perianal disease. Within the perianal group, all patients had concurrent intestinal CD. The commonest sites were colonic (L2)(8/19; 42.11%) and ileocolonic (L3)(8/19; 42.11%). The ileum (L1) was affected in 1 patient (1/19; 5.26%) and 2 patients had concomitant upper gastrointestinal CD with ileocolonic disease (L3+L4)(2/19; 10.53%). The presence of OFG and perianal disease significantly increased the chances of developing intestinal CD (OR = 222, p = 0.0002, 2-tail Fisher Test). In the perianal group, 11/19 patients (11/19; 57.89%) were diagnosed with CD prior to developing OFG. The median time to diagnosis of OFG was 10 years after the diagnosis of intestinal CD. Conclusion Perianal disease in Crohn’s disease is common and is associated with a more severe disease course.1Perianal disease in OFG patients is less common, however, where it does occur it is always associated with intestinal CD in our cohort. Therefore, these patients should be investigated accordingly. The diagnosis of OFG was usually made later in the course of intestinal Crohn’s suggesting it is a later development. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Ardizzone S, Porro GB. Perianal Crohn’s disease: overview. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:957–958 Schwartz D, Loftus EV, Tremaine WJ, et al. The natural history of fistulising Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 2002;122:875–880
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".