MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296762767 · doi:10.1144/geochem2015-000

Eion Matheson Cameron 1933–2014

2015· article· en· W2296762767 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G.E.M. Hall, Kéiko Hattori

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On May 30th of 2014 we lost a truly gifted and outstanding geochemist, pioneer, loyal friend, co-founder of the Association of Applied Geochemists (then the Association of Exploration Geochemists, AEG, and now AAG), and founder of the Association’s first journal, the Journal of Exploration Geochemistry (JGE): Eion M. Cameron. Most of Eion’s long and illustrious career was spent at the Geological Survey of Canada (1966–2000) as both a research geochemist and as Head of the Applied Geochemistry Subdivision, comprising some 32 scientists and technical staff. A major emphasis of Eion’s research was on the development, testing and application of new and improved methods of detecting ore deposits both at surface and buried at depth. His accomplishments in this area are diverse. For example, he established lake sediment and water geochemistry as an effective mineral exploration tool in Canada’s north. In 1972, Eion carried out the first regional-scale geochemical survey in Canada, sampling lake sediments and waters over 93 000 km2 of the Northwest Territories in only six weeks with three choppers and one float plane. Some of the discoveries, as a result, are the Yava and Hackett River VMS deposits. This survey paved the way for Canada’s National Geochemical Reconnaissance Program. Still in the 1970s, he led the first GSC multi-disciplinary multi-agency …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Exploration Environment AnalysisSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207